James L. Messenger is a Partner in the Boston office of GRSM. James focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation in areas such as energy, business transactions, shareholder disputes, franchise disputes, breach of fiduciary duty claims, and environmental matters. He is an arbitrator for the American Arbitration Association (AAA). James frequently represents energy companies as lead counsel in major infrastructure projects. James is chair of the Environmental Permitting Infrastructure practice group.
Commercial and Employment Litigation
- JTH Tax v. Morrell et al. (M.D. Fl. 2024) – Counsel for a national franchisor in a breach of franchise agreement case against former franchisee and his general manager in the Middle District of Florida. After evidentiary hearing, obtained magistrate report recommending a preliminary injunction in favor of the franchisor and against the franchisee and general manager to enforce post-term non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.
- JTH Tax v. Merit (D. Colo. 2024) – Counsel for a national franchisor in a breach of franchise agreement case against a former franchisee in the District of Colorado. After oral argument, obtained a preliminary injunction in favor of the franchisor and against the franchisee to enforce post-term non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.
- JTH Tax. v. Kukla (2d. Cir. 2024) – Counsel for a national franchisor successfully defended on appeal the Eastern District of New York’s entry of default judgment, permanent injunction, and contempt order against the former franchisee defendants on behalf of their client. See JTH Tax v. Kukla (E.D.N.Y. 2022).
- JTH Tax v. Beckwith et al. (D. Del. 2023) – Counsel for a national franchisor in a breach of franchise agreement case against a former franchisee in the District of Delaware. After evidentiary hearing, obtained a preliminary injunction in favor of the franchisor and against the franchisee to enforce post-term non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.
- Molnar v. Lantheus Medical Imaging (Mass. Superior Court 2022) – Counsel for Lantheus Medical Imaging, and several officers, in a suit brought by the former Chief Medical Officer alleging breach of a severance agreement. The plaintiff dismissed the entire case with prejudice—with no settlement—shortly after the start of discovery and defending the depositions of the CEO and General Counsel.
- JTH Tax v. Gilbert (M.D. Fla. 2022) – Counsel for a national franchisor in a breach of franchise agreement case against a former franchisee in the Middle District of Florida. After evidentiary hearing, obtained a preliminary injunction in favor of the franchisor and against the franchisee to enforce post-term non-competition and non-solicitation covenants following an evidentiary hearing.
- JTH Tax d/b/a Liberty Tax Service (2021-Present) – Counsel for tax franchisor in multiple cases seeking to enforce post-termination franchise agreement obligations.
- International Arbitration for Publicly Traded Company (2019) – Counsel for a publicly traded company as plaintiff in a fourteen-day AAA international arbitration concerning breach of contract against a contract manufacturing organization hired to produce a product. Successfully obtained a $3.5 million judgment for the client.
- Estate of Beverly Spavins (2018) – Lead Counsel representing the estate of a decedent in a will dispute in which the decedent’s family challenged the will based on alleged incompetency of the decedent. After a five-day trial, the probate judge found that the will was knowingly and wilfully made and affirmed the will.
- Beninati v. Borghi 070914 MASUP, 12-1985 BLS2 (2011 – 2014) – Lead Counsel representing Plaintiff Elizabeth Beninati in a shareholder derivative case on behalf of the Workout World New England (WOW) Companies against defendants who froze out/ constructively terminated the plaintiff and diverted corporate opportunities and started a competing chain of health club using WOW resources and goodwill. After a 20-day bench trial in the Business Litigation Session of Suffolk Superior Court, obtained a seven-figure verdict for the plaintiff including a $9,000,000 award of attorney fees. On appeal, the judgment was doubled pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A.
- Fent v. Oklahoma Corporation Council, Solix Inc. (2010) – Defended company against qui tam suit challenging the constitutionality of statutes under which the State of Oklahoma contracted with client and seeking client, Solix, to return millions of dollars received for contract services. Prevailed on summary judgment, establishing that statutes were constitutional and contracts were effective.
- Abry Partners v. FW Acquisition LLC, (Del. Ch. Ct. 2006) – Represented a defendant, a private equity firm, in a rescission and fraud suit. The plaintiff sought to rescind a $500 million sale of a publishing company. James had the principal responsibility of drafting the motion to dismiss and managing fact discovery. His motion to dismiss resulted in the dismissal of all but one claim. This lawsuit has been cited extensively in law review articles.
- WT Holding Corp. v. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., et al., (Suffolk Sup. Ct. 2004) – The plaintiff sought to place a lis pendens on a commercial condominium project and to preliminarily enjoin the sale of luxury condominiums on the Boston Common, including thirty luxury condominiums that were scheduled to close in the next thirty days. The Suffolk Superior Court denied the motion for lis pendens and the motion for preliminary injunction. The plaintiff then filed an interlocutory appeal and a single justice denied the motion for interlocutory appeal.
- PDC Milford Power, LLC v. KBC Bank NV, et al. (D. Mass. 2004) – Defended a bank consortium in a lender liability case. Related cases were pending in New York and Delaware. After the defendants filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff withdrew its complaint.
- Beverage Realty, Inc. v. Chatham Club LLC, 2003 WL 444572 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2003) – James represented Beverage in a breach of contract claim against Chatham and in defense of Chatham’s breach of contract counterclaim. He successfully moved for summary judgment on Beverage’s claims against Chatham and knocked out half of Chatham’s counterclaims against Beverage in connection with summary judgment motions After he filed a motion in limine which would have effectively terminated the case, Chatham stopped prosecuting its counterclaims, and the court entered final judgment, dismissing all of Chatham’s counterclaims with prejudice.
- Crystal Group, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc. (N.D. Iowa Ct. 2001 –2003) – Represented a defendant in a case in which the plaintiff asserted trade secret misappropriation, breach of confidentiality agreement claims, and fraud claims. The majority of the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed on the defendant’s summary judgment motion.
- Summit Investors II v. Sechris Inuds., Inc., 19400 (Del. Ch. 9-2-2002) – Represented Summit against Sechrist Industries seeking to enforce a put and call agreement. In connection with that action, Sechrist filed breach of contract and breach of fiduciary claims against Summit. James wrote a motion to dismiss, argued the motion in front of the Delaware Chancery Court, and was successful in having all of Sechrist’s claims against Summit dismissed. Summit later achieved a highly favorable settlement on its affirmative claims against Sechrist.
- Pittston Co. v. Sedgwick James of New York, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 915 (D. N.J. 1997) – Represented Sedgwick James in connection with claims brought by Pittston for uninsured losses at an oil terminal facility in New Jersey. Drafted a successful motion for summary judgment disposing of all claims Pittston brought against Sedgwick James. Wrote the appellate brief and argued the appeal in the Third Circuit. The case was settled after oral argument but before the decision by the Third Circuit.
- Picker Intern., Inc. v. Leavitt, 865 F. Supp. 951 (D. Mass. 1994) – Represented Picker in trade secret claims against Imaging and defense of Imaging’s antitrust claims against Picker. James was extensively involved in drafting a successful summary judgment motion dismissing all of Imaging’s nine counts against Picker. He was then Co-Counsel in connection with Picker’s trade secret and copyright claims against Imaging and prevailed in a nine-day trial in federal court in Massachusetts. He later took the lead in drafting the Appeals Court brief and argued in front of the First Circuit. The First Circuit upheld the district court’s verdict in favor of Picker.
- Speaker, Clean Water Act 401 – Guardian of Water Quality or Political Hammer?, Energy Bar Association, May 7, 2018
- Co-Chair, Cyber Security: Risks and Challenges, 15th Annual CEO Forum, New England Legal Foundation, December 5, 2011
Admissions
- Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
- U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
- U.S. District Court, Eastern and Southern Districts of Texas
- U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Second, and Third Circuits
- U.S. Supreme Court
Memberships
- New England Legal Foundation, Board of Directors
- Lawyers Committee on Civil Rights, Boston Chapter, Board Member
- American Civil Liberties Union, Cooperating Attorney
- Boston Law Journal, Former Editor
- Massachusetts Bar Association
- Boston Bar Association
- American Bar Association
- Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Community Involvement
- Norfolk County Children’s Advocacy Center, Board Member
Education
- J.D., cum laude, Suffolk University Law School, 1985
- B.A., summa cum laude, Sociology, Boston University, 1978
Honors
- AV Preeminent Rating, Martindale-Hubbell