Tyler Tarney is a seasoned litigator and trial lawyer whose national practice focuses on restrictive covenant and trade secret disputes. When a team walks out the door with clients, data, or colleagues—or when a competitor races to court for a TRO—clients turn to him for his deep experience with emergency injunctive relief and forensics, and his track record on both sides of the “v.” He has particular depth in the staffing industry and has obtained or defeated immediate injunctive relief in eight federal district courts from New York to Colorado.
Restrictive Covenant/Trade Secret
- Lead trial counsel for Fortune Global 500 company prosecuting non-compete/trade secret/employee raiding matters in Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington against competitors and former employees.
- Obtained or defeated emergency injunctive relief in eight federal district courts.
- Secured emergency appellate stay of an injunction a Fortune 500 competitor had won in Texas state court.
- Defeated federal preliminary injunction requested by competitor against braided composites manufacturer.
- Secured various high-stakes discovery orders in competitor litigation including orders compelling early/pre-discovery trade secret identification and competitor communications with counsel under crime-fraud privilege exception.
- Advised national companies and C-level executives on a wide range of trade secret, non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality, and IP theft issues, and on departing-employee investigations and forensic preservation.
Results
- Consent injunction, $400,000 in payments, and competitor wind-down. LHH Recruitment Solutions, Inc. v. Premier Talent Advisors, LLC, No. 3:25-cv-01008 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2026) (consent injunction entered against competitor and four former employees on restrictive covenant, tortious interference, and trade secret claims following motion for TRO and preliminary injunction; resolution included $400,000 in payments and competitor winding down operations).
- TRO and preliminary injunction against coordinated team departure. Adecco USA, Inc. v. Simonov, 2025 WL 2815297 (D. Colo. June 17, 2025) (issuing TRO against former employees and competitor for restrictive covenant breaches and tortious interference); 2025 WL 2493076 (D. Colo. July 30, 2025) (converting TRO into preliminary injunction), appeal dismissed, No. 25-1334 (10th Cir. Dec. 2, 2025).
- TRO, preliminary injunction, contempt, and disgorgement against former franchisee. JTH Tax, LLC v. Samb, 2024 WL 1549462 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 9, 2024) (TRO for breaches of restrictive covenants in franchise agreement and on trade secret and trademark infringement claims); 2024 WL 1704537 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2024) (preliminary injunction); 2025 WL 2969654 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 22, 2025) (recommending contempt and sanctions), adopted, No. 3:24-cv-102 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2026) (finding contempt, awarding $31,022.03 in fees and costs, and ordering disgorgement of profits and a full accounting).
- Emergency appellate stay. Defended company and executive in Fortune 500 competitor’s restrictive covenant and trade secret action in Texas state court, obtaining an emergency stay of the trial court’s injunctive order from the Dallas Court of Appeals and defeating the competitor’s motion to reconsider the stay, before reaching a negotiated resolution.
- Preliminary injunction after three-day evidentiary hearing. Adecco USA, Inc. v. Staffworks, Inc., 2020 WL 7028872 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2020) (granting preliminary injunction in part for breaches of non-compete, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure covenants); 2021 WL 2593304 (N.D.N.Y. June 23, 2021) (denying motion to dismiss in action against 10 defendants asserting breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation, trademark infringement, tortious interference, and conversion claims).
- Injunction against five former employees. Modis, Inc. v. Frank Recruitment Group, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-03290 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2020) (issuing injunction against five former employees on non-solicitation, confidentiality, and return-of-property covenants).
- TRO and permanent injunction against competing e-discovery company. Special Counsel, Inc. v. Matter Discovery, LLC, No. 1:20-cv-01615 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 12, 2020) (issuing TRO against competing e-discovery company and five former employees enforcing restrictive covenants); No. 1:20-cv-01615 (N.D. Ill. May 22, 2020) (permanent injunction).
- Preliminary injunction against competitor and former employee. Modis, Inc. v. The Judge Group, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-10618 (E.D. Mich. July 11, 2019) (issuing preliminary injunction enforcing restrictive covenants against competitor and former employee).
- Competitor’s preliminary injunction defeated. A&P Tech., Inc. v. Lariviere, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211822 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 27, 2017) (denying braided composites manufacturer’s motion for preliminary injunction against competitor and former employee in trade secret dispute and granting in part motion for pre-discovery trade secret identification).
- Trade secret plaintiff forced to identify its secrets; crime-fraud discovery compelled. Safety Today, Inc. v. Roy, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17116 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2014) (ordering trade secret plaintiff to identify trade secrets with particularity); 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147765 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 11, 2013) (compelling communications under crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege in trade secret dispute).
Employment Litigation
- Defended hundreds of employment matters in federal and state courts and before the EEOC, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, and various state and federal agencies, involving discrimination, retaliation, harassment, FMLA, ADA, whistleblower, and wrongful-discharge claims.
- Lead counsel for employer in whistleblower arbitration alleging $24,000,000 in damages, securing complete dismissal of all claims after a three-day evidentiary hearing.
- Secured dismissals and summary judgments in state and federal courts, including multiple Sixth Circuit decisions affirming judgment for the employer.
- Counsels employers, from national companies to C-suite executives, on restrictive covenants, executive compensation, severance agreements, handbooks, and terminations.
Results
- Morgan v. Interstate Resources, Inc., 2023 WL 6283290 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 26, 2023) (summary judgment on age and national origin discrimination claims), aff’d, 2024 WL 3221394 (6th Cir. June 28, 2024).
- Provitt v. J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc., 2023 WL 8357442 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2023) (dismissing race discrimination, retaliation, and contract claims).
- Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, No. 3:12-cv-00324 (S.D. Ohio) (summary judgment on ADA claims).
- Walker v. Vill. of Addyston, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167360 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2016) (judgment on the pleadings dismissing claims for public employee benefits).
- Holbrook v. Dumas, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148192 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 2, 2015) (summary judgment on First Amendment retaliation claim), aff’d, 658 F. App’x 280 (6th Cir. 2016).
- McCowen v. Vill. of Lincoln Heights, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174178 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2014) (summary judgment on Title VII retaliation claim), aff’d, 624 F. App’x 380 (6th Cir. 2015).
- Muringai v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152847 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2014) (summary judgment on race discrimination claims).
Commercial Litigation
- Lead counsel in hundreds of high-stakes state, federal, and arbitration disputes nationwide, frequently involving class, consolidated, and multi-plaintiff actions and immediate injunctive relief, breach of contract, RICO, fraud, conspiracy, tortious interference, and unfair competition claims.
- Lead counsel for title agency in RICO class action alleging fraudulent real estate investment scheme involving 450+ putative class members.
- Lead counsel in aviation litigation brought by former “Top Gun” pilot.
- Defended financial-education and algorithmic-trading companies and founder against securities-fraud, commodities, and fraud claims brought by dozens of investors across coordinated actions and arbitration involving algorithmic forex trading and cryptocurrency.
- Defended boutique IP law firm in high-stakes action alleging malpractice in representing prosthetics manufacturer in series of underlying bet-the-company federal patent cases.
- Secured dismissals and summary judgments in state and federal courts, appellate decisions affirming dismissal, and judgments at trial.
Results
- Ramsey v. Receivables Performance Mgmt., LLC, 2026 WL 2916680 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 29, 2026) (on reconsideration, vacating prior $122,500 partial summary judgment for plaintiff and granting summary judgment for client on TCPA claims).
- Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking Ltd., L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-400, 264 N.E.3d 859 (10th Dist.) (affirming dismissal of Ohio Corrupt Practices Act, conspiracy, complicity, and other claims), jurisdiction declined, 2025-Ohio-2048.
- Redding v. United States Parachute Assn., 2025-Ohio-4631 (11th Dist.) (affirming dismissal of contract, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference claims and $45,419.56 frivolous-conduct sanctions award), jurisdiction declined, 2026-Ohio-846; 2023-Ohio-884 (11th Dist.) (affirming dismissal of all claims against skydiving non-profit and its officers).
- Brockman v. Brookwood Capital Advisors, LLC, 2025 WL 2772456 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 29, 2025) (dismissing breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and unjust enrichment claims against auctioneer).
- First Brands Group, LLC v. Neenah, Inc., 2023 WL 6065109 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 18, 2023) (judgment declaring client entitled to $500,000 escrowed earnest money deposit and dismissing declaratory relief, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment claims).
- Jackson v. Apple, 2022 WL 4132883 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 12, 2022) (dismissing fraud, conspiracy, and related claims).
- Salata Holding Co., LLC v. Chepri, LLC, 2021 WL 1964614 (S.D. Ohio May 17, 2021) (dismissing negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment claims in software contract dispute).
- Timbuk Farms, Inc. v. Hortica Ins. & Emp. Benefits, 2021-Ohio-4141 (5th Dist.) (affirming summary judgment dismissing tree farm wholesaler’s claims that herbicide application contaminated irrigation pond and damaged tens of thousands of plants).
- B3DC Navy Yard, LLC v. Epoch Design Grp., Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30926 (D.D.C. Feb. 24, 2020) (dismissing third-party negligent-design claims against mechanical engineering firm arising from District of Columbia Navy Yard tower project).
- Lefkowitz v. Ackerman, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156006 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 25, 2017) (dismissing RICO and fraud claims against psychologists).
- Novel v. Zapor, No. 2:14-cv-264 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2016) (dismissing RICO and fraud claims against law firm and attorneys), aff’d, No. 16-3363 (6th Cir. Dec. 6, 2016 & June 21, 2017) (affirming and awarding attorney fees for frivolous appeal).
- Jackson v. Force, No. 12CV83 (Miami C.P. Feb. 6, 2014) (summary judgment on tortious interference claims against real estate broker), aff’d, 2014-Ohio-3167 (2d Dist.)
Complex Litigation, Multi-District Litigation, & Mass Torts
- Appointed by federal court as one of six national Liaison Counsel representing a group of defendants in the opioid MDL (1,400+ cases), facilitating early exits for three clients in 40 Ohio opioid matters, including multiple class actions.
- Coordinated defense for chemical supplier and obtained early exits in 32 Ohio and Iowa cases alleging diacetyl exposure.
- Lead counsel in hundreds of nationwide actions involving pharmaceuticals, hazardous chemicals, cosmetics, talc, asbestos, benzene, pesticides, medical devices, and home appliances.
Admissions
- Ohio
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Tenth Circuits
- U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of Ohio
- U.S. District Court, Northern & Western Districts of New York
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois & Trial Bar
- U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania
- U.S. District Court, Southern & Northern Districts of Indiana
- U.S. District Court, Eastern & Western Districts of Michigan
- U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
- U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
Education
- J.D., summa cum laude, Capital University Law School, 2012
- Executive Content & Business Editor, Capital University Law Review, Volume 40
- Staff Member, Capital University Law Review, Volume 39
- Pro Bono Legal Honors
- B.S., Economics, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, 2009
Honors
- Super Lawyers® Rising Stars distinction in Business Litigation, Employment Litigation: Defense, Class Action/Mass Torts: Defense, and Professional Liability: Defense, 2019-2027
- Capital University Law School Young Alumnus of the Year, 2020