Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan R. Stuckel and Associate Delann N. Fraschetti Finch recently secured the dismissal of a whistleblower retaliation complaint filed under Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) on behalf of an auto parts company operating in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
A former driver employee alleged that the company reduced his hours, disciplined him, and ultimately terminated his employment in retaliation for raising workplace safety concerns, including complaints of vehicle load weight and facility maintenance issues. The employee claimed that these actions constituted unlawful retaliation for engaging in protected activity under the OSH Act.
The GRSM team conducted an investigation and submitted a comprehensive position statement demonstrating that the company promptly addressed the employee’s safety concerns and that the challenged employment action was based on legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons. GRSM established that the employee’s hours were reduced based on operational demands, as hours were reduced for many other employees. Additionally, the employee was terminated due to documented performance issues, refusal to perform assigned duties, and customer complaints regarding his conduct, not for any protected activity.
After completing its investigation, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) agreed with the company’s position and concluded that the evidence did not establish a causal relationship between the employee’s protected activity and the adverse employment actions. OSHA dismissed the complaint in its entirety.
This result highlights GRSM’s ability to effectively defend employers against whistleblower retaliation claims at the agency level through detailed factual investigations, strategic advocacy, and the successful presentation of legitimate business reasons supporting employment decisions. The matter also serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining contemporaneous documentation of employee performance issues, disciplinary actions, complaints, and workplace concerns, as such records often prove critical in demonstrating the legitimate, non-retaliatory basis for employment decisions.